
Introduction
Modern warfare has undergone a profound transformation with the advent of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. These versatile platforms have redefined military strategies, offering unparalleled capabilities in surveillance, precision strikes, and electronic warfare. From the rugged terrains of conflict zones to urban counter-terrorism operations, drones have become indispensable tools for nations seeking to maintain tactical and strategic superiority. India, in particular, has emerged as a leader in leveraging drone technology, both in bolstering its air defense systems and in executing precise operations against terrorist threats. This article explores the evolution of drone warfare, India’s robust air defense mechanisms against drone incursions, the failure of Chinese air defense systems in recent conflicts, and India’s strategic use of modern drones in counter-terrorism operations.
The Evolution of Drone Warfare
Drones have transitioned from rudimentary reconnaissance tools to sophisticated multi-role platforms integral to modern military arsenals. Their origins trace back to early 20th-century experiments, such as the 1917 Kettering Aerial Torpedo, but significant advancements occurred in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. The 2002 arming of the RQ-1 Predator with Hellfire missiles marked a pivotal moment, transforming drones into lethal hunter-killer systems. Today, drones like the MQ-9 Reaper and Turkey’s Bayraktar TB2 exemplify the fusion of long-endurance surveillance with precision strike capabilities.
Drones offer several advantages: they reduce risks to human personnel, enable real-time intelligence gathering, and provide cost-effective alternatives to traditional military assets. In conflicts like the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war, Azerbaijan’s use of drones decimated Armenian air defenses, highlighting their ability to neutralize high-value targets. Similarly, the Russia-Ukraine conflict has showcased drones’ versatility, from first-person view (FPV) kamikaze drones to naval unmanned surface vehicles (USVs). However, drones also pose challenges, as their affordability and accessibility empower non-state actors, including terrorist groups, to deploy them for attacks or smuggling.
India’s Air Defense Superiority Against Drones

India’s strategic location, bordered by adversarial neighbors, necessitates a robust air defense system capable of countering diverse aerial threats, including drones. Recent incidents, particularly along the India-Pakistan border, underscore the growing threat of drone incursions used for smuggling weapons, drugs, and explosives. Pakistan-backed terrorist groups have increasingly employed drones, including Chinese-made quadcopters, to orchestrate cross-border attacks, such as the April 2025 Poonch terror attack, where drones dropped weapons to militants.
India has responded with a multi-layered counter-unmanned aircraft system (C-UAS) architecture, integrating advanced technologies and indigenous innovations. A notable demonstration of this capability occurred on May 7–8, 2025, when India neutralized over 50 Pakistani drones in a large-scale operation across Udhampur, Samba, Jammu, Akhnoor, Nagrota, and Pathankot. The operation, dubbed Operation Sindoor, showcased India’s integrated air defense grid, led by the Russian-origin S-400 system and supported by indigenous systems like the Akash, Barak-8, and SPYDER missiles. Posts on X from May 2025 highlighted the effectiveness of this “invisible shield,” with indigenous systems like the Akash and MR-SAM playing a pivotal role in intercepting swarm drone attacks.
India’s C-UAS capabilities are further enhanced by cutting-edge technologies. The Bhargavastra Micro-Missile System, developed by Economic Explosives Ltd, is designed to counter swarm drone threats, with radar detection ranges of 10 km for medium-to-large UAVs and 6 km for micro-drones. Successfully tested in early 2025, this mobile platform operates in diverse terrains, including high-altitude regions. Additionally, the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) has advanced laser-based systems, such as the Integrated Drone Detection and Interdiction System, which neutralized a Chinese drone near the Line of Control in April 2025. The D-4 counter-drone system, equipped with radar and electro-optical sensors, has proven effective during national events, while Project KALI aims to disrupt enemy electronics using high-energy electromagnetic radiation.
These systems reflect India’s commitment to self-reliance under the Aatmanirbhar Bharat initiative, reducing dependence on foreign technology. The synergy between DRDO, private industry, and academic institutions has fostered innovations like the Dronaam counter-drone system, which jams drone communications and has been ordered in bulk by the Indian Air Force. This comprehensive approach ensures India’s airspace remains secure against evolving drone threats.
Failures of Chinese Air Defense Systems
In stark contrast to India’s air defense success, Chinese-supplied air defense systems have shown significant vulnerabilities in recent conflicts, particularly during India-Pakistan hostilities in May 2025. Pakistan, a close ally of China, relies heavily on Chinese-made systems like the HQ-9P and HQ-16 surface-to-air missile platforms to protect strategic locations such as Lahore. However, during Operation Sindoor on May 7, 2025, these systems failed to detect or intercept Indian strikes, including those involving SCALP missiles and drones. Indian media reported that the HQ-9P and HQ-16 systems, customized for Pakistan, were destroyed near Lahore, with no missile interceptions recorded.
The failure of these Chinese systems can be attributed to several factors. The HQ-9P, a shorter-range export variant of China’s HQ-9 with an estimated range of 125 km, struggles against low-altitude, stealthy threats like the SCALP missile, which employs terrain-hugging flight paths to evade radar detection. Posts on X following the operation noted that the Chinese systems’ radar, designed for larger threats, couldn’t detect smaller drones or precision-guided munitions. Additionally, India’s use of surprise tactics—executing the operation during a Pakistani civil defense mock drill—exploited readiness gaps in Pakistan’s air defense network, further exposing the limitations of the HQ-9P and LY-80 systems, which were supplemented with early warning radars and electronic jammers but still failed to respond effectively.
This incident has raised questions about the reliability of Chinese air defense technology. Analysts have pointed out that while the HQ-9 is modeled after Russia’s S-300, its export variants lack the sophistication needed to counter modern drone and missile tactics. A user on X described the event as a “complete failure of Made in China Air Defense,” reflecting broader sentiment about the systems’ inefficacy. China has since acknowledged these shortcomings, with reports indicating that their air defense systems neutralized only about 40% of incoming UAVs in recent exercises, prompting rapid investment in new technologies to address these gaps.
India’s Use of Modern Drones Against Terrorists
India’s military has adeptly integrated drones into its counter-terrorism strategy, leveraging their precision and versatility to neutralize threats while minimizing collateral damage. The Indian Army’s deployment of drones in September 2023 to flush out Lashkar-e-Toiba terrorists in Jammu and Kashmir exemplifies this approach. Following an attack that killed Colonel Manpreet Singh, Major Ashish Dhonchak, and Deputy SP Humayun Bhat, drones equipped with high-grade targeting systems were used to locate and eliminate the perpetrators. These operations demonstrated drones’ ability to operate in rugged terrains like the Himalayas, where traditional surveillance is challenging.
Indigenous drones, such as the DRDO-developed Rustom-II, have bolstered India’s capabilities. With a 350 kg payload capacity, including electro-optical sensors and synthetic aperture radar, the Rustom-II excels in intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) missions. The Indian Army has also inducted loitering munitions, or “suicidal drones,” like the Nagastra, which execute precision strikes with minimal risk to friendly forces. Operation Sindoor in May 2025 marked the combat debut of these munitions, which conducted simultaneous strikes across multiple sectors, overwhelming Pakistani defenses and further exposing the inefficacy of Chinese air defense systems.
Swarm drone technology is another area where India is making strides. Coordinated groups of UAVs, integrated with AI-based surveillance systems, enable real-time data analysis and precision strikes. These drones can support air defense by intercepting rival UAVs and surveilling terrorist hideouts, as seen in operations against Pakistan-backed proxies in Punjab. The Advik Recce and InsideFPV E-15 drones, equipped with high-resolution cameras and AI-driven tracking, have enhanced India’s ability to monitor and neutralize threats in complex environments.
India’s drone ecosystem, supported by over 200 startups, ensures rapid development and deployment of these technologies. The 2021 Drone Rules have spurred private-sector innovation, positioning India as a potential global drone hub by 2030. This industrial base allows India to sustain prolonged operations, replacing lost drones quickly and maintaining pressure on adversaries.
Challenges and Ethical Considerations
While drones offer significant advantages, their proliferation raises ethical and strategic concerns. The accessibility of commercial drones enables terrorist groups to weaponize them, as seen in the Islamic State’s use of quadcopters in Iraq and Syria. India’s counter-terrorism operations must balance precision with the risk of civilian casualties, adhering to the Indian Army’s 2018 Land Warfare Doctrine, which emphasizes minimum force and winning hearts and minds. The psychological impact on drone operators, who witness strikes remotely, also warrants attention, as does the potential for drones to escalate conflicts in nuclearized South Asia, especially given the demonstrated weaknesses of Chinese air defense systems in the region.
Conclusion
Drones have reshaped modern warfare, offering nations like India the tools to enhance air defense and counter-terrorism efforts. India’s multi-layered C-UAS architecture, combining indigenous innovations like the Bhargavastra and laser-based systems with advanced missile defenses, has established its superiority in neutralizing drone threats. The failure of Chinese air defense systems, such as the HQ-9P and HQ-16, during Operation Sindoor underscores the limitations of these technologies against modern tactics, providing a stark contrast to India’s robust defenses. Simultaneously, the strategic use of drones like the Rustom-II, Nagastra, and swarm UAVs has enabled precise and effective operations against terrorists, particularly in challenging terrains. As India continues to invest in drone technology and foster industry-academia collaboration, it is poised to lead in the global drone warfare arena, securing its borders and countering threats with unparalleled precision.